Editorial standards

The standards we hold our writing to.

How we research, write, source, use AI, attribute, and correct mistakes on ASAD’s blog, case studies, and frameworks. Public so readers can hold us to it.
Six principles

What we will and will not do.

Practitioners write the pieces

Every blog post and case study on this site is written by someone who actually runs the work. Not freelance content marketers, not generic SEO writers.

Sources are real and named

Where we cite a stat or a study, we link to the primary source. We do not invent statistics. We do not cite “industry research” without a URL.

AI assists, does not write

We use AI tools for research, draft acceleration on outlines, prompt monitoring, and quality checks. We do not use AI to write final drafts that ship on this site or any client domain.

Client work needs client sign-off

Every case study we publish has written approval from the client. We do not invent quotes, and we do not invent clients. Where a client is in a regulated industry, pre-launch, or has explicit confidentiality requirements, we describe the engagement honestly with the brand redacted, and we name the industry, market, and client-reviewed scope. The published metrics in those cases are sourced from the client’s own analytics and reviewed with the client before going on the site. We do not publish anonymised “case studies” for clients we have not actually worked with.

Authorship is real

Every piece has a named author with a real bio. Where Shantanu is the author, the byline is Shantanu. Where someone else on the team writes, they are credited.

Corrections are visible

When we get something wrong, we correct it in place, log the correction at the bottom of the piece, and reach out to anyone who shared it where reasonably possible.

Research and sourcing

Our blog posts start from primary research we have conducted in client engagements, original analysis of public data, or interviews with practitioners. We do not aggregate other people’s takes into “10 things to know about AI search” round-ups.

When we cite external sources, we link to the original. If a statistic appears in our work, you can trace it back to a study, a public dataset, or a named expert. If we cannot link it, we either replace it with something we can or remove it.


Use of AI in writing

We are an AI search agency, and we use AI tools daily. We are also clear about the lines:

  • We use AI for: research, draft acceleration on outlines, brainstorming counter-arguments, summarising long source documents for our own use, prompt monitoring for client tracking, quality checks on grammar and structure.
  • We do not use AI for: writing the final draft of anything that ships on asad.ae or any client domain, generating fake quotes or fake expert opinions, producing case study text without client sign-off, ghostwriting founder posts without the founder reviewing every word.

The reason for the line is practical, not philosophical. AI engines visibly down-weight content that reads as AI-generated. Using AI to write final drafts would defeat the work we do for clients. So we do not.


Editing and fact-checking

Every published piece is read by at least two people before it goes live. The author, plus one editor (typically Shantanu for substantive pieces, plus a copy reviewer for grammar and structure). Material claims about engagements, clients, or external facts are checked against source before publication.


Attribution and quotes

When we quote someone, the quote is real and attributable. We do not paraphrase and present as direct quotes. We do not invent quotes from “industry leaders” or “marketing executives”. Where a client appears in our content with a quote, the quote has been said by them and approved for publication.


Corrections

When we get something wrong, we want to know. To report a correction or factual issue, email hello@asad.ae with “Correction” in the subject line. We will review and respond within five working days.

If we make a correction, we update the piece in place, add a “Correction” note at the bottom with the date and the nature of the correction, and where the original piece was widely shared, we reach out via the same channels to flag the update.


Conflicts of interest

Where we write about a tool, vendor, or partner we have a commercial relationship with, we disclose it clearly inside the piece. Where a client of ours is mentioned, we say so. We do not write covertly favourable content about clients or covertly unfavourable content about non-clients.


Author bios and credentials

Every author bio names the role, the relevant experience, and links to a verifiable profile (LinkedIn or company page). Where credentials are claimed (certifications, prior employers, education), they are real and can be checked.

Found a mistake

Tell us, and we will correct it visibly.

If something we have written is factually wrong, misleading, or out of date, we want to know. Email hello@asad.ae with “Correction” in the subject line, the URL, and what you would like us to look at. We respond within five working days.
Editorial policy maintained by Shantanu Pandey, founder of Tenet and ASAD.